Skip to content
GRØNN — Designing Living Ecosystems

Ecological Water Design

Two Ponds, One Living System

Location
Utrecht, Netherlands
Main intervention
Planted stream connection, wetland biofilter, wildlife edges
Status
Developing
Two Ponds, One Living System

01Project Introduction

A private garden with two separate ornamental ponds, both installed a decade apart and both struggling. The client wanted clear water, less maintenance and more life — without losing the character of the garden.

02Existing Situation

The upper pond sat in full sun with no planting and turned green every summer. The lower pond was shaded, silted and slowly leaking. Neither had shallow edges, so wildlife could reach the water but not use it.

03Ecological Challenge

Both ponds were isolated elements: no circulation, no filtration, no connection to the soil and planting around them.

  • Water leaving the site too quickly through the leak
  • No circulation between sun-warmed and shaded water
  • Limited habitat — steep liner edges, no marginal planting
  • Nutrient load with nothing planted to absorb it

04Design Strategy

Treat the two ponds as one system. Water is lifted once from the lower pond and returns by gravity through a planted stream, a wetland biofilter and a shallow spillway — so every metre of the route filters, oxygenates or hosts life.

05System Diagram

The upper pond overflows into a planted stream that drops through a gravel wetland. The wetland's root zone strips nutrients before the water re-enters the lower pond across a stone spillway that doubles as a bird bath and insect drinking edge.

Water circulation diagram: upper pond, planted stream, wetland biofilter, spillway, lower pond, return lineUPPER PONDPLANTED STREAMWETLAND BIOFILTERSPILLWAYLOWER PONDRETURN — SINGLE PUMP LIFT
Every metre of the route filters, oxygenates or hosts life

06Materials and Planting

Excavated stone was reused for the spillway and stream bed. Planting follows wet-to-dry gradients: submerged oxygenators, marginal rushes and sedges, moisture-loving perennials on the banks, and a native hedge line for shelter.

07Construction Process

Phase one repaired the lower pond and shaped the new edges. Phase two built the stream and wetland filter. Phase three planted the system and calibrated flow rates over several weeks of observation.

08Result

Clear water within one season, dragonflies and amphibians in the first summer, and a garden that now sounds like moving water instead of a pump.

09Long-Term Development

The wetland filter matures over two to three years as root mass builds. Maintenance shifts from cleaning to editing: thinning vigorous planting and letting the system settle into its own balance.

10The Transformation

The site after the interventionBeforeAfter
The same ground, two summers apart: a mown corridor became circulating water, planted banks and stone refuges.

11Measured Outcomes

Aquatic and marginal species observed

Counted along both ponds and the stream edge, seasons one and two.

11to34

Rainwater retained per storm event

Roof and terrace runoff now feeds the system instead of the sewer.

0 m³to18 m³

Excavated stone returned as habitat

Dry-stacked into edges and refuges rather than hauled away.

80%

Maintenance hours per season

The biofilter does the work the weekly regime used to.

26 hto6 h

Soil organic matter, planted banks

Three seasons tracked; undisturbed soil and mulch left in place.

2.1%to4.8%

12Project Metrics

Water retained on site
≈ 18 m³
Hard surface removed
42 m²
Habitat zones created
6
Native species added
58
Water circulation
Continuous, gravity-assisted
Materials reused
80% of excavated stone